Dietary tryptophan depletion in humans using a simplified two amino acid formula – a pilot study

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Dietary tryptophan depletion in humans using a simplified two amino acid formula – a pilot study

Maike Linden1,2, Katrin Helmbold1,2, Janina Kempf1,2,3, Shabnam Sippas1,2,3, Christian Filss4, Karl-Josef Langen4,5,6, Albrecht Eisert7 and Florian Daniel Zepf1,2,8,9*

1Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; 2JARA Translational Brain Medicine, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany; 3Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 4Section JARA-Brain, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Jülich, Germany; 5Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany; 6Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; 7Department of Pharmacy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; 8Centre and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences & School of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; 9Specialised Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), Department of Health in Western Australia, Perth, Australia

Abstract

Background: Acute tryptophan depletion (ATD) is a well-established dietary method in translational brain research used to briefly lower central nervous serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)) synthesis. A simplified two amino acid ATD formula (ATDPHE/LEU) was developed while reducing the overall amount of amino acids (AAs), with the objective of administration especially in children and adolescents in future studies.

Objective: This study investigated tryptophan (TRP) influx rates across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) after dietary ATDPHE/LEU administration relative to the ATD Moja-De protocol that has been established for use in children and adolescents.

Design: Seventy-two healthy adults (50% females) were randomized into four groups and administered ATD Moja-De, its TRP-balanced control condition (BAL), ATDPHE/LEU, or its respective control mixture (BALPHE/LEU) in a counterbalanced, double-blind, between-subjects design. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at hourly intervals for 6 h after AA intake. Questionnaires about mood, taste, and challenge tolerance were completed at fixed time points.

Results: Both challenge mixtures significantly reduced central nervous TRP influx as calculated by Michaelis–Menten kinetics relative to baseline and the respective control conditions with only mild and comparable side effects. A greater decline in TRP influx over the BBB after ATDPHE/LEU administration when compared with ATD Moja-De was detected without group effects for taste, challenge tolerance, and mood. There was unintended initial short increase in plasma TRP concentrations observed after ATDPHE/LEU intake, and a possible redistribution between free and protein-bound TRP triggered by protein synthesis stimulated by the ingested AAs may account for this finding. Moreover, a decline in TRP influx after BALPHE/LEU administration over a 6-h period was observed, and the large amount of PHE in the BALPHE/LEU mixture may be a possible explanation for this particular phenomenon, which could have led to an unexpected increase in displacement of TRP at the BBB in this control condition.

Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary evidence for the possibility of lowering TRP influx as calculated by Michaelis–Menten kinetics into the brain by using a simplified ATD protocol in humans. The simplified composition of only two AAs, the lower overall AA amount, and the appropriate tolerance are characteristics of the newly developed ATDPHE/LEU protocol. Future studies focusing on the effects of the ATDPHE/LEU protocol and its respective control condition on CSF 5-HIAA concentrations, as well as neurochemical studies in rodents, are needed to further validate this newly developed AA mixture before definite conclusions about its usability in ATD-related research in humans, its specificity, and additional effects can be made.

Keywords: serotonin; amino acids; dietary tryptophan depletion; influx rate; Michaelis–Menten kinetics; humans

Citation: Food & Nutrition Research 2016, 60: 29272 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v60.29272

Copyright: © 2016 Maike Linden et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Received: 26 July 2015; Revised: 26 September 2016; Accepted: 3 November 2016; Published: 16 December 2016

Competing interests and funding: FDZ was the recipient of an unrestricted award donated by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE), and AstraZeneca (Young Minds in Psychiatry Award). He has also received research support from the German Federal Ministry for Economics and Technology, the European Union (EU), the German Society for Social Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, the Paul and Ursula Klein Foundation, the Dr. August Scheidel Foundation, the IZKF fund of the University Hospital of RWTH Aachen University, the Telethon Perth Childrens’ Hospital Research Fund (TPCHRF), the Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation, the Telethon Kids Institute, and a travel stipend donated by the GlaxoSmithKline Foundation. He is the recipient of an unrestricted educational grant, travel support, and speaker honoraria by Shire Pharmaceuticals, Germany. In addition, he has received support from the Raine Foundation for Medical Research (Raine Visiting Professorship) and editorial fees from Co-Action Publishing (Sweden). All authors report no conflicts of interest.

*Correspondence to: Florian Daniel Zepf, Centre and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway (M561), Crawley WA 6009, Perth, Australia, Email: florian.zepf@uwa.edu.au

To access the supplementary material to this article, please see Supplementary files under ‘Article Tools’.

 

Acute tryptophan depletion (ATD) is an established dietary challenge procedure used to investigate the central nervous effects of the neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)) in humans and rodents by a short term and reversible reduction in the brain 5-HT synthesis rate. This method has been commonly used in translational brain research for more than 25 years and is of both clinical and scientific relevance, particularly because 5-HT modulates an extensive range of physiological and behavioral functions (1). Moreover, it is known to be involved in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of a variety of different behaviors and neuropsychiatric disorders, including affective, eating, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (213).

ATD is accomplished through the administration of a mixture of large neutral amino acids (LNAAs) lacking tryptophan (TRP). Because 5-HT is not able to pass the blood-brain barrier (BBB), it is synthesized from its physiological precursor, the amino acid (AA) TRP, in the brain. A small proportion of TRP reaches the central nervous system through passive diffusion. The majority of free TRP uses the active transport system L-1, a carrier in the capillary cell plasma membrane specialized for the transportation of all LNAAs, to cross the BBB (14). An affinity to the aforementioned AA, increased by 100–1,000 times, characterizes the BBB-specific type of the L-1 system (15). Moreover, L-systems differing in these and other properties can be found in all cell types in the human body (e.g. gastrointestinal tractus and hepatic and renal tissues). The uptake of TRP into the brain using L-1, which is saturated under physiological conditions, marks a facilitated diffusion that follows Michaelis–Menten kinetics with competitive substrate inhibition of the LNAAs at the common transporter (1517). When orally administering a beverage of LNAAs lacking TRP, it was shown that TRP plasma concentrations decline because of increased protein synthesis in the liver, which is induced by the administered AA load. Based on preliminary findings in rats (18), this is thought to be an underlying principle of the ATD challenge procedure introduced by Young et al. because of reduced substrate availability for brain 5-HT synthesis with regard to reduced plasma TRP levels. Moreover, ATD makes use of the outlined competitive substrate inhibition, resulting in a diminished uptake of endogenous TRP into the central nervous system at L-1 (1923). Specifically, the administered AAs compete with endogenous TRP at L-1 for uptake into the central nervous system. The synthesis of 5-HT in the brain comprises two steps: first, the hydroxylation of TRP by the tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2) into 5-hydroxytryptophan, followed by a 5-hydroxytryptophan decarboxylase catalysis in the second step, which leads to 5-HT (24, 25). TPH2 is involved in the rate-limiting step of the central nervous 5-HT synthesis pathway, with TPH2 showing a saturation of approximately 50% under physiological conditions (26). As a consequence, reduced substrate availability of TRP due to competing mechanisms at the L-1 when other AAs are administered leads to a lowered central nervous 5-HT synthesis rate. As outlined above, AA administration is thought to induce restricted 5-HT synthesis by stimulating protein synthesis in the liver with the consumption of additional TRP from plasma stores (26, 27).

The history of ATD development is characterized by a variety of modifications of the respective AA mixtures. In 1977, Concu et al. (28) applied the ATD technique to humans using 18.2 g of a TRP-free mixture (containing L-glycine, L-lysine (LYS), L-methionine (MET), L-phenylalanine (PHE), L-leucine (LEU), L-isoleucine (ILE), L-threonine (THR), and L-valine (VAL)). They detected a decline in serum TRP by 42% in healthy men (29). Moja et al. (30) also tested a similar formulation, lacking glycine, in healthy male subjects. In their study, plasma TRP decreased to ~35% of the initial level following the administration of an AA dose of 36.6 g. Most of the published ATD studies refer to a protocol introduced by Young et al. (31). Young and colleagues used a 100 g mixture of 15 amino acids (nine LNAA and six non-essential AAs) and found a 76% decrease in plasma TRP. This formulation can cause a large range of side effects (such as nausea, vomiting, headache, and dizziness), which were also reported in other ATD studies (2, 20, 3235). Dougherty et al. (21) found that reducing the amino acid dose to only 50 g helped diminish observed side effects while implying a slightly less robust depletion when compared with the 100 g formulation.

ATD Moja-De, a modification of the formulation by Moja et al. (30), was developed in 2002 (36, 37) with the aim of establishing a body weight-adapted dosing regimen that can be used in minors. This concept does not only help to reduce side effects to a tolerable level but also allows the application of ATD Moja-De to children and adolescents as well as adults, opening further developmental research perspectives for future studies. Moreover, ATD Moja-De is the only available ATD formulation to date that has been shown to decrease brain 5-HT in mice (38).

Based on the above mentioned developments, we decided to establish a new formulation, called ATDPHE/LEU, for optimizing TRP depletion procedures in healthy adult humans. Once data in adult humans are obtained as proposed in this study, this formulation could potentially be used for future studies in children and adolescents. Our motivation was to introduce a new protocol for a possible later use in children and adolescents allowing a reduction of the overall AA amount and a less complex composition, leading to a solid depletion magnitude while reducing or maintaining the very low side effects established in ATD Moja-De. Hence, a new protocol was developed based on mathematical considerations and existing data that showed differing affinities of competing AAs to L-1 (16), thus impacting TRP influx over the BBB to the greatest extent. ATDPHE/LEU was intended to consist of two AAs, PHE and LEU, as these show the highest affinities to the L-1 transporting enzyme of all competing LNAAs (16, 36). Therefore, based on a recent study confirming the effectiveness of a similar simplified protocol in a mouse model (12), we expected adequate stimulation of protein synthesis in the liver (thus leading to a decline in plasma TRP) and a more effective displacement of TRP by PHE and LEU at the common BBB transporter.

The primary aim of this study was to make a comparison of the new dietary depletion protocol’s efficacy against that of the established ATD Moja-De, contrasting challenge conditions (ATD, ATDPHE/LEU) and their counterbalanced control conditions (BAL, BALPHE/LEU) in healthy adults. We collected several blood samples over a defined time interval and calculated TRP influx rates across the BBB using Michaelis–Menten kinetics with a correction for multiple substrate inhibition.

Methods

Study design

The study employed a controlled, double-blind, between-subjects design. One of the four different AA mixtures, ATD Moja-De, BAL (a TRP-balanced AA load serving as a control condition for ATD Moja-De), ATDPHE/LEU (the new ATD AA mixture), or BALPHE/LEU (the newly developed control condition for ATDPHE/LEU), was administered to a sample group of healthy adult subjects. Blood samples were collected at hourly intervals for 6 h. Participants also completed questionnaires on mood, challenge tolerance, and taste evaluations.

Ethics statement

The ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the RWTH Aachen University, Germany, evaluated and approved the study protocol. The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided oral and written informed consent. After completion of all measurements, participants were financially compensated.

Sample

Participants were recruited through local advertisements. A total of 72 subjects (50% females) aged between 18 and 33 years (mean age 23.60±3.08 years) participated in the study. All subjects were right-handed native German speakers who did not suffer from any physical (excluded by interview) or psychiatric disorder (evaluated by a standardized screening interview for psychiatric disorders, the SKIDPIT-light (39)). The exclusion criteria included the following: an IQ lower than 85; smoking; the use of regular medications excluding oral contraceptives; drug abuse; pregnancy; psychoorganic syndromes; schizophrenia; affective disorders; and neurological and somatic diseases such as migraines, asthma, diabetes, metabolic or hormonal disorders, allergies or obesity. The mean BMI of the participants was 22.4±2.5 kg/m2. Using the CFT-20R (40), the participants’ IQ (mean IQ=112±13.6) was assessed. Approximately 20 individuals were excluded by these criteria during the recruitment process. Primary pre-screening for inclusion/exclusion criteria was conducted by telephonic interview. Written informed consent was obtained after in-person screening and clarification by a doctor. Subjects verified by self-report that they had followed the instructions regarding beverage and food intake. Negative urine drug screens and pregnancy tests were required before the administration of the AA beverages. The complete descriptive data of the sample are given in Table 1.


Table 1.  Descriptive data of the study sample
  ATD BAL ATDPHE/LEU BALPHE/LEU
Age M±SD 23.11±2.89 23.94±3.15 23.67±2.66 23.72±3.69
  Min. 18 18 18 19
  Max. 30 32 29 33
IQ M±SD 107.67±16.36 113.22±12.10 114.61±14.97 112.89±10.27
  Min. 80 97 76 97
  Max. 138 142 142 134
BMI M±SD 22.90±2.53 22.18±2.81 22.21±2.52 22.25±2.41
  Min. 18.8 17.9 19.4 18.8
  Max. 27.3 29.0 29.4 26.9
Descriptive data of the study sample are divided into four conditions/groups: acute tryptophan depletion mixture Moja-De (ATD), the TRP-balanced control condition for ATD Moja-De (BAL), the new ATD amino acid mixture (ATDPHE/LEU), or the newly developed control condition for ATDPHE/LEU (BALPHE/LEU). Mean±standard deviation (M±SD), maximum (Max.), and minimum (Min.) values are listed for age, IQ, and body mass index (BMI).

Depletion procedure

Measurements began at the same time each morning in order to avoid the influence of circadian rhythms on metabolism and central nervous 5-HT synthesis. The AA beverages were administered between 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. The study duration was approximately 6 h. The participants were instructed to abstain from food high in protein beginning at 8:00 p.m. the night before each study day, and they were not allowed to drink any beverages other than water. They received a standardized low-protein breakfast (carbohydrate 68.3 g, fat 1.13 g, protein 5.1 g, and dietary fiber 2.3 g) containing two wheat rolls as well as one small pack of jam (25 g) and honey (25 g) immediately following the administration of the AA beverages with a 20-min time frame for breakfast. The particular AA mixtures were composed by a pharmacist and delivered within an aqueous suspension. In order to reduce the risk of undesired lump formation, the crystalline amino acids were solubilized as much as possible with a low sugar substitute in an amount of 200 ml of water using a milk frother. Beverage intake period was reduced to a minimum of approximately 3 min. The sample was divided into four randomized and counterbalanced groups of 18 people with equal gender distributions (9 women and 9 men). The administration of the different AA beverages was counterbalanced for sex. Participants of each group either received ATD, BAL, ATDPHE/LEU, or BALPHE/LEU.

The neurodietary challenge procedure ATD Moja-De was previously used successfully with children and adolescents and had few side effects due to the administration regimen that adapted dosage to body weight (26) (36) (37) (38) (41) (42) (43) (44). The dosage per 10 kg of body weight contained L-PHE (1.32 g), L-LEU (1.32 g), L-ILE (0.84 g), L-MET (0.5 g), L-VAL (0.96 g), L-THR (0.6 g), and L-LYS (0.96 g). TRP (0.7 g per 10 kg of body weight) was added to the corresponding control condition (BAL). The newly developed AA mixture (ATDPHE/LEU), also dosed per 10 kg of body weight, consisted only of L-PHE (3.2 g) and L-LEU (3.0 g); BALPHE/LEU, the new mixture’s control condition, contained an additional dose of 0.7 g of TRP per 10 kg of body weight.

Blood samples

Blood samples (BS) were collected using a permanent venous catheter at baseline (T0) and each hour (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, and T6) after the intake of ATD, BAL, ATDPHE/LEU, or BALPHE/LEU (BS0, BS1, BS2, BS3, BS4, BS5, and BS6), resulting in seven blood samples per subject. A 9-ml Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA-Tube) (EDTA S-Monovette®, Sarstedt, Germany) and one 7.5-ml Serum-Tube (Serum S-Monovette®, Sarstedt, Germany) were used for sample collection each hour. To avoid falsification of the blood values, the first 4.5 ml of every sample was rejected. The collected blood samples were kept at room temperature for 20 min and centrifuged at 2,500 g for 10 min. The resulting clear supernatant was removed with a pipette and kept in 2-ml Eppendorf Tubes® at −80°C until transportation to the laboratory.

For the TRP influx calculations, plasma levels of PHE, Tyrosine (TYR), and TRP were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The detection of the branched-chained AAs (BCAA: LEU, ILE and VAL) concentration using a BCAA test kit (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany) for photometric analyses of enzyme levels in plasma and serum was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Information regarding sensitivity and specificity of the employed test kits is provided in Supplementary Table 1.

Influx calculation into the brain for TRP, TYR, and PHE

We calculated the influx of TRP across the BBB using Michaelis–Menten kinetics with a correction for multiple substrate competition, which is an established procedure in ATD-related research (16, 45). As the competitive substrate inhibition of TRP and the LNAAs at the common transporting enzyme L-1 determines the uptake of TRP into the brain, this equation provides a valid mathematical model for calculating the unidirectional TRP influx rates into the central nervous system (26, 36, 46). The equation (see Supplementary file) includes both components influencing TRP uptake: the facilitated diffusion of AAs at L-1 and passive diffusion (36). Influx rates of the competing LNAAs PHE, TYR, as well as BCAA influx were calculated using the same equation. In addition to the abovementioned influx calculations, we also provided the following ratios to ensure comparability with previous ATD studies: [TRP]/[CAA], [TYR]/[CAA], [PHE]/[CAA], and [PHE+TYR]/[BCAA+TRP] (CAA=competing amino acids). These ratios predict the entry rates of the involved amino acids into the brain and present another possible approach for evaluating ATD protocols.

Questionnaires

Mood

The German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (47) containing 10 items for positive (PA) and 10 items for negative (NA) affect was used to measure the extent to which depletion influenced the subjects’ mood state. Participants rated the intensity of each item on a five-point Likert scale (from 1=not at all to 5=very much) at baseline and every hour before the collection of the blood samples.

Challenge tolerance

We developed an in-house questionnaire on the tolerance of the AA challenges to detect if the newly developed mixture caused an equal amount of side effects as the established ATD Moja-De procedure. The questionnaire contained 12 items rated from 0 (disagree) to 3 (strongly agree). For evaluation purposes, we summarized the matching items and calculated a somatic complaints score, an awakeness score, and a hunger score. The common side effects observed in previous ATD studies, namely, headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and sweating (48), were included in this questionnaire (the entire questionnaire is available in the Supplementary file). Participants completed this questionnaire every hour and immediately before and after the intake of the AA beverages.

Taste

For taste evaluation, an in-house questionnaire consisting of six items was employed (see Supplementary file). The consistency, the sulfuric taste, the difficulty of intake, and revulsion were assessed using a scale of 0 (disagree) to 3 (strongly agree) immediately after the intake of the AA beverages.

Statistical analysis

As primary analysis, the influence of the four different AA mixtures on TRP influx across the BBB was investigated using repeated measures analyses of variance (rmANOVAs) with treatment as the between-subjects factor, time as the within-subjects factor, and gender as a covariate in SPSS Version 21.0 for MacOS. The degrees of freedom for the ANOVA F-statistics were adjusted according to the Greenhouse–Geisser correction for non-sphericity (p<0.05). Similar analyses were performed on TYR and PHE influx across the BBB, on [TRP]/[CAA] ratio, on tolerance (the somatic complaints score, awakeness score, and hunger score), and on the PA- and NA-PANAS scores over time. In addition, separate ANOVAs, with the Greenhouse–Geisser correction, on the TRP influx for each group using time as a within-subjects factor were performed. One-way ANOVA was used to determine any significant differences in [TRP]/[CAA] ratio, in TRP, TYR, and PHE influx rates between the groups at baseline (T0). The influences of the different side effects (e.g. headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and sweating), part of the somatic complaints score, were assessed by rmANOVAs with time as the within-subjects factor and treatment as the between-subjects factor. One-way ANOVA with gender as a covariate was employed to analyze taste differences between the four mixtures. Gaussian distribution for all dependent variables was established with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for each of the four groups and for the groups formed by dividing the participants by gender. The level of statistical significance was set and kept at p<0.05. Because of the explorative nature of this study, alpha-adjustment was not employed. Post hoc power analyses were performed using G*Power Version 3.1.9.2. for MacOS.

Results

All plasma AA concentrations of TRP, PHE, TYR, and BCAA are presented in Table 2. Table 3 includes all calculated influx values for TRP, TYR, PHE, (TYR+PHE), and BCAA across the BBB.


Table 2.  Blood concentrations of tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and BCAA
Parameter Mixture Baseline (T0) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
[TRP] in μmol/l ATD 70±3 117±22 111±23 95±22 83±22 75±23 69±17
  BAL 68±3 418±22 437±23 393±22 372±22 261±23 178±17
  ATDPHE/LEU 66±3 107±22 110±23 111±22 108±22 105±23 97±17
  BALPHE/LEU 68±3 460±22 407±23 422±22 409±22 397±23 308±17
[PHE] ATD 51±24 376±53 484±92 393±96 419±117 313±118 242±115
  BAL 55±24 329±53 400±92 330±96 310±117 284±118 192±115
  ATDPHE/LEU 112±24 972±53 1236±92 1457±96 1571±117 1427±118 1182±115
  BALPHE/LEU 86±24 977±53 1474±92 1816±96 1926±117 1683±118 1416±115
[TYR] ATD 59±4 108±8 120±13 109±14 100±14 94±15 88±12
  BAL 55±4 97±8 97±13 85±14 79±14 71±15 60±12
  ATDPHE/LEU 59±4 132±8 170±13 193±14 204±14 197±15 189±12
  BALPHE/LEU 62±4 130±8 169±13 195±14 207±14 206±15 196±12
[BCAA] ATD 416±20 1444±53 1458±56 1374±61 1251±57 1040±64 819±47
  BAL 412±20 1278±53 1297±56 1249±61 1137±57 905±64 744±47
  ATDPHE/LEU 405±20 1078±53 971±56 953±61 822±57 628±64 485±47
  BALPHE/LEU 400±20 1024±53 945±56 973±61 827±57 604±64 446±47
Plasma amino acid concentrations (in µmol/l) of tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA; including valine, leucine, and isoleucine) after the administration of four different amino acid mixtures: ATD (acute tryptophan depletion; challenge condition), BAL (control condition for ATD), ATDPHE/LEU (newly developed challenge condition), and BALPHE/LEU (control condition for ATDPHE/LEU). Mean values±standard error are given for the different groups (each including 18 subjects) at the seven time points of blood withdrawal (T0–T6).


Table 3.  Calculated influx values of particular amino acids across the BBB
Parameter Mixture Baseline (T0) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
TRP-influx ATD 13.573±0.479 6.912±0.603 6.004±0.609 5.715±0.645 4.897±0.637 5.485±0.752 6.452±0.552
  BAL 13.313±0.479 17.190±0.603 16.533±0.609 16.821±0.645 16.864±0.637 14.122±0.752 14.236±0.552
  ATDPHE/LEU 12.135±0.479 3.969±0.603 3.434±0.609 3.125±0.645 2.934±0.637 3.155±0.752 3.557±0.552
  BALPHE/LEU 12.483±0.479 12.449±0.603 9.483±0.609 8.828±0.645 8.435±0.637 8.939±0.752 8.191±0.552
TYR-influx ATD 5.647±0.297 2.997±0.167 3.002±0.173 3.139±0.173 2.911±0.189 3.514±0.266 4.078±0.311
  BAL 5.338±0.297 2.054±0.167 1.866±0.173 1.877±0.173 1.921±0.189 1.959±0.266 2.523±0.311
  ATDPHE/LEU 5.213±0.297 1.905±0.167 2.038±0.173 1.964±0.173 2.022±0.189 2.285±0.266 2.765±0.311
  BALPHE/LEU 5.464±0.297 1.515±0.167 1.530±0.173 1.501±0.173 1.582±0.189 1.859±0.266 2.348±0.311
PHE-influx ATD 10.391±0.630 18.342±0.628 19.733±0.918 18.719±0.981 19.493±1.120 18.008±1.219 16.975±1.119
  BAL 10.819±0.630 14.706±0.628 16.091±0.918 14.764±0.981 14.540±1.120 14.522±1.219 14.088±1.119
  ATDPHE/LEU 12.234±0.630 26.229±0.628 28.661±0.918 30.627±0.981 31.642±1.120 30.493±1.219 28.378±1.119
  BALPHE/LEU 11.978±0.630 24.250±0.628 29.411±0.918 32.387±0.981 33.428±1.120 31.321±1.219 29.325±1.119
BCAA-influx ATD 11.968±0.453 15.582±0.448 15.112±0.501 15.502±0.570 14.340±0.544 14.018±0.612 12.901±0.435
  BAL 11.736±0.453 12.198±0.448 11.692±0.501 12.092±0.570 11.570±0.544 10.245±0.612 10.809±0.435
  ATDPHE/LEU 10.937±0.453 8.505±0.448 7.131±0.501 6.524±0.570 5.587±0.544 4.464±0.612 3.872±0.435
  BALPHE/LEU 10.814±0.453 7.352±0.448 6.171±0.501 5.968±0.570 5.044±0.544 3.958±0.612 3.164±0.435
Calculated influx values (in nmol/min/g brain tissue) for tryptophan (TRP), tyrosine (TYR), phenylalanine (PHE), and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA; including valine, leucine, and isoleucine) across the blood-brain barrier after the administration of four different amino acid mixtures: ATD (acute tryptophan depletion; challenge condition), BAL (control condition for ATD), ATDPHE/LEU (newly developed challenge condition), and BALPHE/LEU (control condition for ATDPHE/LEU). Mean values±standard error are presented for the different groups (each including 18 subjects) at the seven time points of blood withdrawal (T0–T6).

TRP influx into the brain

No significant differences in TRP influx were present at baseline (T0) when comparing ATD, BAL, ATDPHE/LEU, and BALPHE/LEU (F[3, 71]=2.005; p=n.s.). An rmANOVA yielded main effects of time (F[3.801, 258.437]=69.972; p<0.001) and group (F[3, 68]=97.577; p<0.001) and a significant time by group interaction (F[11.402, 258.437]=25.875; p<0.001). Bonferroni post hoc analyses indicated significant differences between each of the four groups (mean TRP influx BAL>BALPHE/LEU>ATD>ATDPHE/LEU; see Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 for detailed results). The comparison of the influx curves for all groups is given in Fig. 1a. Separate rmANOVAs with time as the within-subjects factor indicated a main effect of time for each group. Table 4 summarizes the degrees of freedom (df) and F- and p-values of these analyses. Time points of maximum TRP influx decline (Tmax), maximum decline in TRP influx in relation to baseline (Declinemax), and overall TRP influx declines from baseline to time point T6 for each group are given in Table 5. Maximum decrease in TRP influx 4 h after intake was 11.9% higher for ATDPHE/LEU compared with the decrease found for ATD. In contrast to ATD, ATDPHE/LEU, and BALPHE/LEU administration, a significant increase in TRP influx was detected in the BAL condition control group during the first 60 min after beverage administration (p=0.002), while no significant changes in influx rates were detected over the entire period from T0 to T6. No effect of gender was detected (F[1, 67]=2.537; p=n.s.). Post hoc power analysis showed that our study was adequately powered (power of 0.95) to detect effect sizes of 0.25 with an alpha level of 0.05 using a between-subjects repeated measures approach (ANOVA). In addition, we calculated Cohen’s d-values as an estimate for effect sizes (d-value of d=0.24 for the comparison of TRP-influx after ATD versus BAL administration; d=0.14 for the comparison of ATDPHE/LEU and BALPHE/LEU).

Fig 1

Fig. 1.  (a, b, c) Influx curves (nmol/min/g brain tissue) of tryptophan (TRP), tyrosine, and phenylalanine across the blood-brain barrier at baseline (T0) and time points T1–T6 after the intake of the ATD Moja-De amino acid (AA) mixture, its balanced control condition (BAL), the newly developed tryptophan depletion protocol ATDPHE/LEU, and the corresponding control condition (BALPHE/LEU). Data are given as the mean values, with bars representing the standard errors.


Table 4.  Results of rmANOVA on tryptophan influx values
  ATD BAL ATDPHE/LEU BALPHE/LEU
df 2.130, 36.206 3.136, 53.314 1.269, 21.579 4.057, 68.962
F 86.110 7.646 120.067 20.645
p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Results of separate repeated measurements analyses of variance (rmANOVAs) on tryptophan (TRP) influx across the blood-brain barrier for ATD (challenge condition), BAL (control condition for ATD), ATDPHE/LEU (newly developed challenge condition), and BALPHE/LEU (control condition for ATDPHE/LEU), with time as the within-subjects factor. df, degrees of freedom; F, F values; p, statistical significance.


Table 5.  Descriptive data of tryptophan depletion graphs
  ATD BAL ATDPHE/LEU BALPHE/LEU
Tmax (min) 240 60 240 360
Declinemax (%) 63.9 29.1 (increase) 75.8 34.4
DeclineT0-T6 (%) 52.5 6.9 (increase) 70.7 34.4
Time points of maximum tryptophan (TRP) influx decline (Tmax), maximum declines of TRP influx in relation to baseline (T0) (Declinemax), and overall TRP influx declines from baseline (T0) to time point T6 (time point of last blood sample) for the groups ATD (challenge condition), BAL (control condition for ATD), ATDPHE/LEU (newly developed challenge condition), and BALPHE/LEU (control condition for ATDPHE/LEU).

TYR and PHE influx into the brain

An rmANOVA on TYR influx rates indicated main effects of time (F[2.122, 144.270]=226.885; p<0.001) and group (F[3, 68]=11.191; p<0.001) and a significant time by group interaction (F[6.365, 144.270]=2.255; p=0.038). Bonferroni post hoc analyses indicated that only ATD showed significant difference from the other three treatment conditions, while no significant difference could be found between the three of them. With regard to TYR influx, the curve progression for all treatment conditions was overall comparable with a strong decrease in TYR influx during the first hour (see Fig. 1b). While TYR influx after ATD administration was maximally decreased by 48% of the baseline value, influx after ATDPHE/LEU displayed a decrease of 71%. Similar analyses for PHE influx values also showed main effects of time (F[3.849, 261.745]=204.575; p<0.001) and group (F[3, 68]=77.348; p<0.001) and a significant time by group interaction (F[11.548, 261.745]=2.255; p<0.001). Bonferroni post hoc analyses indicated significant differences between all groups, except of ATDPHE/LEU versus BALPHE/LEU that did not present any significant results. PHE influx curves for all groups can be found in Fig. 1c. For ATDPHE/LEU and BALPHE/LEU, PHE influx values showed an increase during the first 4 h, followed by only a small decrease until T6 (ATDPHE/LEU: maximum increase by 159% of baseline; BALPHE/LEU: maximum increase by 179% of baseline). In comparison, a much smaller increase of PHE influx appeared after ATD (maximum increase by 89% of baseline) and BAL (increase by 49% of baseline) administration.

[TRP]/[CAA]

Figure 2 shows the time course of [TRP]/[CAA] ratios for the four treatment conditions, which offers a comparable development with regard to TRP influx calculations, but with a focus on plasma concentrations. No significant differences in the ratios were present at baseline (T0) when comparing ATD, BAL, ATDPHE/LEU, and BALPHE/LEU (F[3, 71]=0.898; p=n.s.). An rmANOVA yielded main effects of time (F[4.213, 286.489]=5.447; p<0.001) and group (F[3, 68]=73.368; p<0.001) and a significant time by group interaction (F[12.639, 286.489]=17.960; p<0.001). Bonferroni post hoc analyses indicated significant differences between each of the four groups except of no significant result for ATD and ATDPHE/LEU. Maximum decrease in [TRP]/[CAA] ratio is reached 4 h after intake (T4) for both protocols. ATD and ATDPHE/LEU reduced the ratio by 66 and 65%, respectively, when compared with baseline. Values of all calculated ratios are given in Table 6, and additional graphs for [TYR]/[CAA] and [PHE]/[CAA] ratios of all groups are presented in Supplementary Fig. S1a and S1b.

Fig 2

Fig. 2.  Curve progression for calculated TRP/CAA ratios from baseline (T0) to time point T6 after the intake of the ATD Moja-De amino acid (AA) mixture, its balanced control condition (BAL), the newly developed tryptophan depletion protocol ATDPHE/LEU, and the corresponding control condition (BALPHE/LEU). Data are given as the mean values, with bars representing the standard errors.


Table 6.  Amino acid ratios
Parameter Mixture Baseline (T0) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
[TRP]/[CAA] ATD 0.134±0.006 0.063±0.013 0.055±0.012 0.051±0.014 0.046±0.014 0.049±0.014 0.057±0.010
  BAL 0.135±0.006 0.251±0.013 0.248±0.012 0.247±0.014 0.253±0.014 0.204±0.014 0.186±0.010
  ATDPHE/LEU 0.123±0.006 0.050±0.013 0.047±0.012 0.044±0.014 0.043±0.014 0.0493±0.014 0.057±0.010
  BALPHE/LEU 0.129±0.006 0.225±0.013 0.168±0.012 0.158±0.014 0.155±0.014 0.172±0.014 0.162±0.010
[PHE]/[CAA] ATD 0.094±0.043 0.232±0.037 0.320±0.078 0.293±0.077 0.329±0.087 0.308±0.117 0.254±0.139
  BAL 0.102±0.043 0.182±0.037 0.220±0.078 0.193±0.077 0.193±0.087 0.213±0.117 0.191±0.139
  ATDPHE/LEU 0.206±0.043 0.759±0.037 1.039±0.078 1.183±0.077 1.399±0.087 1.548±0.117 1.561±0.139
  BALPHE/LEU 0.163±0.043 0.610±0.037 0.952±0.078 1.155±0.077 1.334±0.087 1.403±0.117 1.462±0.139
[TYR]/[CAA] ATD 0.108±0.006 0.056±0.004 0.059±0.004 0.059±0.005 0.059±0.006 0.068±0.009 0.081±0.012
  BAL 0.103±0.006 0.048±0.004 0.046±0.004 0.043±0.005 0.045±0.006 0.047±0.009 0.056±0.012
  ATDPHE/LEU 0.105±0.006 0.063±0.004 0.075±0.004 0.079±0.005 0.086±0.006 0.103±0.009 0.124±0.012
  BALPHE/LEU 0.112±0.006 0.054±0.004 0.062±0.004 0.063±0.005 0.070±0.006 0.085±0.009 0.112±0.012
[PHE+TYR]/ ATD 0.226±0.051 0.318±0.043 0.428±0.093 0.405±0.093 0.447±0.103 0.451±0.145 0.395±0.194
[BCAA+TRP] BAL 0.229±0.051 0.250±0.043 0.289±0.093 0.255±0.093 0.257±0.103 0.285±0.145 0.270±0.194
  ATDPHE/LEU 0.359±0.051 0.963±0.043 1.373±0.093 1.594±0.093 1.927±0.103 2.268±0.145 2.450±0.194
  BALPHE/LEU 0.313±0.051 0.756±0.043 1.188±0.093 1.452±0.093 1.723±0.103 1.882±0.145 2.096±0.194
Ratios of tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA; including valine, leucine, and isoleucine) and their competing amino acids (CAA) after the administration of four different amino acid mixtures: ATD (acute tryptophan depletion; challenge condition), BAL (control condition for ATD), ATDPHE/LEU (newly developed challenge condition), and BALPHE/LEU (control condition for ATDPHE/LEU). Mean values±standard error are given for the different groups (each including 18 subjects) at the seven time points of blood withdrawal (T0–T6).

Taste

One-way ANOVA of the taste evaluation scores with gender as a covariate yielded no significant difference in taste perceptions between the groups (F[3, 67]=0.997; p=n.s.) and no effect of gender (F[1, 67]=0.102; p=n.s.).

Challenge tolerance

An rmANOVA evaluation of challenge tolerance indicated a main effect of time for the analysis of the hunger score (F[4.760, 314.190]=4.457; p=0.001); post hoc testing indicated a significant increase in hunger from baseline (T0) to T6 (p=0.001). Similar analyses of the awakeness score also yielded a main effect of time (F[4.182, 275.991]=9.741; p<0.001). Within the 6 h from baseline (T0) to T6, the awakeness score decreased significantly (p=0.001), but participants felt most tired at T2. The main effects of time (F[4.018, 265.208]=5.077; p=0.001) and group (F[3, 66]=3.939; p=0.012) were detected for the somatic complaints score and indicated an increase in somatic complaints over time. Bonferroni post hoc analyses showed a significant difference between BALPHE/LEU and BAL administration (p=0.012). The average somatic complaints score related to BALPHE/LEU administration (average score 0.708±0.117) was four times greater than the values reported by the BAL condition group (average score 0.169±0.121). While the participants overall felt more unwell 2 h (T2) after the intake of the AA mixtures (p=0.022), the somatic complaints scores decreased from T2 to T4 (p=0.002), with only a slight, non-significant increase observed at T6 compared with the baseline score. At baseline, there were no significant differences in somatic complaints scores between the groups (F[3, 68]=0.169; p=n.s.). Analyses of each individual item in the somatic complaints score showed a comparable development of nausea. The report of nausea significantly increased from T0 to T2 (p=0.046) and then significantly decreased from T2 to T4 (p=0.014). No gender effects were detected in the hunger (F[1, 65]=0.192; p=n.s.), awakeness (F[1, 65]=0.769; p=n.s.), or somatic complaints scores (F[1, 65]=0.179; p=n.s.).

Mood assessment (PANAS)

An rmANOVA of the PA score showed a main effect of time (F[3.335, 220.091]=54.110; p<0.001), but no significant effect of group (F[3, 65]=0.215; p=n.s.) or gender (F[1, 65]=0.933; p=n.s.). Compared with the baseline score, a decrease in the PA score of 28.5% at T6 was observed (p<0.001). The NA score also decreased (11.4% from baseline to T6; F[3.198, 211.086]=12.502; p<0.001, rmANOVA) regardless of gender (F[1, 65]=0.268; p=n.s.).

Discussion

The results of this pilot study indicate that dietary administration of ATDPHE/LEU led to a greater depletion magnitude with regard to the TRP influx across the BBB compared with the depletion observed when using the ATD Moja-De protocol, but not with regard to plasma TRP concentrations because of an unintended initial short increase in plasma TRP concentrations that was observed after ATDPHE/LEU intake (see further below in this section for a discussion). The found effect on TRP influx across the BBB was observed even though ATDPHE/LEU, which consisted of only two AAs (PHE and LEU), was administered in a lower overall AA dose. Participants evaluated the tolerance level of the new AA challenge beverage as acceptable. No situations or events necessitating premature termination of the study occurred (such as participants vomiting during measurements or other incidents affecting ratings). Thus, several criteria for a potentially valid and effective ATD-test protocol were already achieved, while other aspects such as the observed unexpected increase in plasma TRP levels require further improvements and future studies in order to validate the findings of the current pilot study.

The altered composition of ATDPHE/LEU, including only two AAs, in contrast to the ATD Moja-De that includes seven different AAs, should lead to a greatly simplified production of the AA beverage. Moreover, it also enables facilitated monitoring of relevant blood parameters (i.e. AA concentrations) as their number was consequently reduced. Such monitoring was further simplified by the development and use of ELISA and BCAA test kits (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany). ATDPHE/LEU uses the same body weight-adapted dosing regimen of the ATD AA mixtures that was first successfully applied in the ATD Moja-De protocol (36, 37). This well-tolerated dosing regimen is based on the assumption of a positive correlation between body weight and plasma TRP levels (36, 37) and, as a significant advantage, leads to a possible application for children and adolescents with fewer side effects (4244, 49, 50).

The greater effectiveness of ATDPHE/LEU in terms of a greater reduction in TRP influx across the BBB when compared with ATD Moja-De could be seen as an advantage, whereas the found effects on plasma TRP concentrations require further investigation. The reason for the detected effects on TRP influx into the brain may lie in the different affinities of the LNAAs to the common L-1 transporter. The Michaelis constant (KM) represents a measurement of these particular affinities. Precisely, it is indicative of the specific substrate concentration needed to achieve the half-maximal rate of turnover of an enzyme. Thus, a lower KM value of a substrate is associated with its higher affinity to the related enzyme. Smith et al. (16) determined the values of transport constants for seven LNAAs, including PHE (0.011 µmol·ml−1) and LEU (0.029 µmol·ml−1), in anesthetized rats. It must be acknowledged that transferring findings from rodent research to humans is subject to limitations. However, these values for the respective transport constants can serve as a first rough estimate, and the high and significant positive correlations between TRP influx and the TRP/CAA ratio (a previous measure for the effects of ATD) are consistent with the theoretical considerations for using Michaelis–Menten kinetics to characterize TRP influx across the BBB. The high affinity of PHE and LEU to L-1, compared with all other LNAAs, may have caused the best displacement of TRP at the common transporter and therefore was possibly associated with a greater reduction of TRP influx across the BBB. By contrast, the ATD Moja-De, containing a mixture of seven different AAs with partly lower KM values, was less effective with regard to the competition of the AAs against TRP, resulting in a smaller TRP depletion magnitude in terms of TRP influx across the BBB compared with the ATDPHE/LEU depletion magnitude. It is possible that the use of this competitive mechanism in the respective AAs enables the potential effectiveness of TRP depletion after ATDPHE/LEU administration, despite the simultaneous reduction in the overall AA dose and thus a possibly decreased stimulation of protein synthesis in the liver when compared to other ATD protocols. This could have impacted the observed findings with regard to changes in plasma TRP concentrations and a possible redistribution between free and protein-bound TRP. The observed TRP influx curves of the old and new challenge protocols over the entire study duration resulted in maximum depletion in terms of decreased TRP influx across the BBB at 4 h after intake for both challenge procedures. In particular, TRP influx correlated highly and significantly with the TRP/CAA ratio for both ATD challenge conditions used (see Supplementary Tables S5 and S6 and Fig. S2a and S2b), but the influx rates are likely to be a more adequate reflection of TRP availability in the brain as they also take the individual affinities of the different amino acids to the L-1 transport system at the BBB into account.

It is important to keep in mind that this work only claims to be a first pilot study. Therefore, the assessment of brain TRP and 5-HT concentrations after ATDPHE/LEU application in rodents has to be an essential part of future research as well as PET-studies and the measurement of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) concentrations (the primary metabolite of 5-HT) in human cerebrospinal fluid in order to validate the effectiveness of ATDPHE/LEU revealed by this study. A recent study by Sánchez et al. (12) has provided preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of simplified ATD protocols using a three-AA-formulation (PHE, LEU, and ILE); however, future studies in humans assessing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 5-HIAA concentrations after intake of the challenge procedure are needed.

The absence of any gender effects in the blood parameters was an expected outcome. Although central nervous 5-HT synthesis is known to significantly differ in males and females (51), we monitored peripheral TRP and LNAA plasma levels for TRP influx calculations; these parameters are not influenced by gender-specific alterations in TRP influx and related central nervous 5-HT synthesis. The performed power analyses confirmed that this study was adequately powered to detect small effects, and Cohen’s d calculations indicated small estimates for effect sizes for the analyses conducted.

Specificity for depleting central nervous 5-HT synthesis (in particular with regard to possible effects on dopamine and other neurotransmitters) is always an important point to be considered with regard to all available ATD-related amino acid formulations. Previous research from our group indicated that the Moja-De protocol does not affect central nervous dopamine synthesis in mice (38). As such evidence is currently missing for the newly developed protocol ATDPHE/LEU, we looked at TYR and PHE plasma values and their calculated influx into the brain. The strong decrease in TYR influx after challenge application, as described above, questions the specificity of the newly developed ATDPHE/LEU condition. The phenomenon of highly increasing PHE influx values in the ATDPHE/LEU protocol group can be explained by its high PHE concentrations. As the strong decrease in TYR influx indicates, the high PHE dose does not mitigate the decrease in TYR influx (calculated from peripheral blood values). Whether the high PHE amount in the ATDPHE/LEU mixture directly affects central nervous concentrations of TYR formation can only be answered using future neurochemical challenge studies. However, specificity for respective neurotransmitters is always a critical issue when dealing with different TRP depletion protocols. This is a general problem in ATD-related research in humans and affects all currently available ATD amino acid formulations. Badawy et al. (52) provided an approach to enhance ATD formulations’ specificity by decreasing the amount of BCAAs. In accordance with this, the reduction of the LEU amount in our newly developed ATDPHE/LEU protocol might be a potential avenue for future research. An unintended rather substantial increase in plasma TRP was observed after ATDPHE/LEU intake besides the fact that no TRP was ingested, and future studies are needed to investigate and replicate this unknown effect. Protein synthesis can be stimulated by the ingested amino acids, which in turn might have led to a possible redistribution between free and protein-bound TRP. Following this train of thought, the amount of free TRP possibly was slightly higher while the overall balance remained unaffected. It also needs to be outlined that TRP-related metabolites, such as quinolinic acid, kynurenic acid, and tryptamine that can be changed due to administration of the balanced mixture, can influence brain function. This stands in line with the issue of the specificity of all ATD/BAL paradigms currently available. Finally, the reason why the fasting TRP levels (T0) were higher than those mentioned in the literature is not clear but worth noting and might be specific to the investigated sample.

Another issue regarding our new ATD challenge protocol is the absence of an appropriate control condition that ‘maintains baseline values without altering the biochemical or behavioral parameters’ (52). The observed rise in TRP influx approximately 1 h after administration of the BAL control condition seems to be a logical consequence of the enhanced TRP availability because the BAL mixture contained TRP. For this particular reason, the decline in TRP influx of 34.4% after BALPHE/LEU administration over the 6-h period appears to be counterintuitive. When comparing BALPHE/LEU with its challenge condition ATDPHE/LEU, the administration of BALPHE/LEU led to a depletion of approximately 50% in magnitude of the depletion observed following ATDPHE/LEU administration. The large amount of PHE in the BALPHE/LEU mixture may be a possible explanation for this particular phenomenon, which in turn could lead to an unexpected increase in displacement of TRP at the BBB in this control condition. To address this particular problem, either an increase in TRP or decreased levels of PHE or LEU in the control condition could be evaluated in future research in order to establish a valid control condition for ATDPHE/LEU.

Both protocols that were applied in this study, ATD and BAL on the one hand and ATDPHE/LEU and BALPHE/LEU on the other hand, were well tolerated by the subjects. In particular, we did not observe any headaches, vomiting, dizziness, or sweating as indicated by the itemizing analyses of our somatic complaints score (see Supplementary Table S3). There were no dropouts caused by side effects. Hence, this requirement of a valid test protocol was met. Although we could not observe a significant group effect for the somatic complaints score between ATD and ATDPHE/LEU indicating a reduction of side effects in the new challenge condition, we achieved the goal of maintaining the high-grade safety of the established ATD Moja-De.

The monitored increase in hunger throughout the study day most likely resulted from the 6-h abstinence from food and a breakfast overall low in nutrition. The lack of any group effect in hunger ratings supports the previous assumption. This observation justifies the necessity of the low-protein breakfast at the beginning of the study day. However, although its carbohydrate content can, to some extent, affect plasma TRP concentration and binding and levels of BCAA, it would not be justifiable to demand fasting beginning at 8 p.m. the night before the study day till 3 p.m. on the study day. Furthermore, the collection of additional behavioral, cognitive, and emotional data during this study for future analysis would have been likely to be skewed by significant fasting effects if no breakfast had been given. In this context, a variety of ATD-using studies also administer low-protein meals during the depletion procedure (5356). In the present sample, we attribute the occurrence of increasing tiredness during the study day to external circumstances, such as the study environment and the long testing period, as opposed to a side effect of the protocol. The missing group effect can be seen as somewhat indicative for this phenomenon. Moreover, breakfast intake could also have impacted side effect ratings as assessed within the present study.

As stated above, we found an effect of group and time for the somatic complaints score. In the separated item analyses, nausea is the only side effect showing a main effect of time and displays an equal development. Although few ATD studies focused on the examination of side effects, nausea appears to be a frequent problem in these particular studies (31, 48). It is very likely that the ingestion of a substantial amount of crystalline AAs (Moja-De: 6.5 g/10 kg body weight, ATDPHE/LEU 6.2 g/10 kg body weight) that remain in the stomach until dissolution in the acidic environment contributed to the reports of nausea (57). The missing group effect in somatic complaint investigations partially supports this assumption because all groups were equally affected. Moreover, post hoc analyses of the somatic complaints scores revealed a significant difference between BAL and BALPHE/LEU administration as a group effect with an average somatic complaints score four times greater after BALPHE/LEU intake. However, with a maximal somatic complaints score of 24 and a minimal score of 0, the very low mean value observed in this study was not indicative of the intolerability of the new control condition. A modification of the BALPHE/LEU control condition, as mentioned above, might help improve the side effect profile of BALPHE/LEU.

Presently, there is no ATD-specific validated questionnaire available for somatic complaint or taste assessment. This study provides first questionnaire-based pilot data and certainly requests validation in future ATD studies. In particular, further refinement is needed regarding the gradual and sensible detection of symptom nuances.

Both positive (PA) and negative (NA) PANAS assessments decreased over the 6-h study duration. In addition to these controversial findings, no group effect was detected, which suggests that the ratings were influenced by the situation during measurements and, perhaps, not a direct consequence of altered brain 5-HT function. This is in agreement with previous findings which suggested that ATD’s influence on mood was largely dependent on the susceptibility of the study sample, and this variability led to a lack of clear mood effects in many cases (58, 59). However, the assessment of mood only served as an ancillary controlling variable in this study, and these results do not significantly impact or question its major findings.

Although subjects took the amino acid mixtures without any major problems and the new mixture was well tolerated in our study, the uncomfortable palatability seen in all groups certainly requests further modification to ensure trouble-free utilization. Bitterness in general is a problematic issue in all ATD studies as it arises from the specific biochemical structure of polar and hydrophobic groups in some amino acids (60). The reduction of the overall amount and dose as well as the absence of the worst tasting AAs (i.e. MET, cysteine, and arginine) might have contributed to an easier administration of ATDPHE/LEU; however, improvements are still required. For this particular purpose, we suggest to add some of the conventional flavoring supplements, such as vanilla, peppermint, raspberry, and lemonade, with low sugar substitutes to our challenge procedure.

The between-subjects design is a limitation of this study. Behavioral paradigms conducted as a part of this study (the findings will be the subject of further publications) did not allow for a within-subject repeated measures design due to possible learning effects; a within-subjects design could be used in further investigations.

Regarding the use of ATDPHE/LEU in behavioral studies, the high amount of LEU might present a problem, in particular as LEU is known to alter glutamate formation within the leucine-glutamate cycle (61, 62). Since LEU might also affect various other parameters, a separate analysis of LEU blood values would be essential to achieve better knowledge of ATDPHE/LEU’s metabolic consequences. In this study, we chose the assessment of the BCAAs within a sum parameter for initial investigations as it provides a cost-saving alternative. Moreover, a further aspect that should be considered in future studies would be to add caffeine withdrawal as an additional exclusion criterion since caffeine has been shown to induce alterations in serotonergic neurotransmission (63, 64).

The ATD method as a serotonergic challenge tool was criticized by Van Donkelaar et al. in a review article (65). Specifically, the authors advised caution in interpreting the selective serotonergic effect of ATD-related results, postulating a contribution by various other non-serotonergic mechanisms to diminished 5-HT metabolism (e.g. alterations in cerebrovascular blood flow, stress influence, and metabolic effects). Furthermore, the missing possibility of direct attribution of ATD-induced behavioral alterations to changes in 5-HT neuronal activity was noted. However, many of the suggested mechanisms and the related hypotheses were based on limited data and primarily indirect conclusions. Overall, there is sufficient and convincing evidence that ATD leads to diminished central nervous 5-HT synthesis. In a rodent model, Biskup et al. (38) demonstrated substantially impaired brain 5-HT synthesis after ATD Moja-De administration. Furthermore, they found a lowered content of 5-HIAA, which is the primary metabolite of 5-HT, and a consequently reduced 5-HT release. As summarized and outlined by Crockett et al. (66), all of the alternative mechanisms suggested in the aforementioned review would lead to broad attentional and executive impairments that have not been found in any ATD study involving humans. In general, we support the need for further research to gain a solidly grounded understanding of the underlying mechanisms of ATD because the extent of contributions of additional mechanisms cannot be reliably estimated.

In conclusion, the greater decline in TRP influx rates across the BBB in healthy adults after the dietary administration of the newly developed simplified ATD protocol, ATDPHE/LEU, relative to the established ATD Moja-De mixture, was the major finding of this study. The altered composition of ATDPHE/LEU, composed of only two LNAAs (PHE and LEU), enabled the reduction in the overall AA amount, had acceptable tolerance, and ensured simplified blood value monitoring due to the reduced components. Nevertheless, this work only represents a first pilot study. Future research is warranted not only to replicate the present findings (optimally a within-subject repeated measures design) but also to improve beverage palatability, its specificity for central nervous 5-HT depletion, and to develop a more suitable balanced control condition (BALPHE/LEU) without significant TRP-related depletion effects. The direct proof of reduced brain 5-HT synthesis in a rodent model (i.e. 5-HT concentrations in brain tissue) would be beneficial, as well as investigations of 5-HIAA levels in human cerebrospinal fluid in order to further validate the newly developed ATDPHE/LEU mixture. Moreover, as an additional step, ATDPHE/LEU requires further study before administering this mixture to children and adolescents can be considered. If the remaining questions with regard to changes in plasma TRP levels, aspects of specificity, and the respective control condition are clarified, the simplified composition of ATDPHE/LEU might have the potential to become an advantageous alternative to the currently available ATD Moja-De protocol for the investigation of the physiological and behavioral effects of reduced central nervous 5-HT synthesis in translational research. However, at this stage, the newly developed ATDPHE-LEU mixture needs further validation and is currently not suitable to specifically study central nervous 5-HT function in humans, and at this point in time it cannot replace the ATD Moja-De ATD protocol.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, BMWi) with a grant to the senior author of this article (FDZ). The lead author (ML) was supported by the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG, IRTG 1328).

References

  1. Zepf FD, Hood S, Guillemin GJ. Food and your mood: nutritional psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry 2015; 2(7): e19. Publisher Full Text
  2. Delgado PL, Charney DS, Price LH, Aghajanian GK, Landis H, Heninger GR. Serotonin function and the mechanism of antidepressant action. Reversal of antidepressant-induced remission by rapid depletion of plasma tryptophan. Arch Gen Psychiatr 1990; 47(5): 411–18. Publisher Full Text
  3. Kishi T, Yoshimura R, Fukuo Y, Okochi T, Matsunaga S, Umene-Nakano W, et al. The serotonin 1A receptor gene confer susceptibility to mood disorders: results from an extended meta-analysis of patients with major depression and bipolar disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatr Clin Neurosci 2013; 263(2): 105–18. Publisher Full Text
  4. Kotting WF, Bubenzer S, Helmbold K, Eisert A, Gaber TJ, Zepf FD. Effects of tryptophan depletion on reactive aggression and aggressive decision-making in young people with ADHD. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2013; 128(2): 114–23. Publisher Full Text
  5. Mette C, Zimmermann M, Grabemann M, Abdel-Hamid M, Uekermann J, Biskup CS, et al. The impact of acute tryptophan depletion on attentional performance in adult patients with ADHD. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2013; 128(2): 124–32. Publisher Full Text
  6. Smith KA, Fairburn CG, Cowen PJ. Symptomatic relapse in bulimia nervosa following acute tryptophan depletion. Arch Gen Psychiatr 1999; 56(2): 171–6. Publisher Full Text
  7. Zimmermann M, Grabemann M, Mette C, Abdel-Hamid M, Uekermann J, Kraemer M, et al. The effects of acute tryptophan depletion on reactive aggression in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and healthy controls. PLoS One 2012; 7(3): e32023. Publisher Full Text
  8. Biskup CS, Gaber T, Helmbold K, Bubenzer-Busch S, Zepf FD. Amino acid challenge and depletion techniques in human functional neuroimaging studies: an overview. Amino Acids 2015; 47(4): 651–83. Publisher Full Text
  9. Helmbold K, Zvyagintsev M, Dahmen B, Bubenzer-Busch S, Gaber TJ, Crockett MJ, et al. Effects of serotonin depletion on punishment processing in the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices of healthy women. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 25(6): 846–56. Publisher Full Text
  10. Hildebrand P, Königschulte W, Gaber TJ, Bubenzer-Busch S, Helmbold K, Biskup CS, et al. Effects of dietary tryptophan and phenylalanine–tyrosine depletion on phasic alertness in healthy adults–a pilot study. Food Nutr Res 2015; 59: 26407. Publisher Full Text
  11. Sanchez CL, Biskup CS, Herpertz S, Gaber TJ, Kuhn CM, Hood SH, et al. The role of serotonin (5-HT) in behavioral control: findings from animal research and clinical implications. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 18(10): pyv050. Publisher Full Text
  12. Sánchez CL, Van Swearingen AE, Arrant AE, Biskup CS, Kuhn CM, Zepf FD. Simplified dietary acute tryptophan depletion: effects of a novel amino acid mixture on the neurochemistry of C57BL/6J mice. Food Nutr Res 2015; 59: 27424.
  13. Gaber TJ, Dingerkus VL, Crockett MJ, Bubenzer-Busch S, Helmbold K, Sánchez CL, et al. Studying the effects of dietary body weight adjusted acute tryptophan depletion on punishment-related behavioral inhibition. Food Nutr Res 2015; 59: 28443. Publisher Full Text
  14. Pardridge WM, Oldendorf WH. Kinetic analysis of blood-brain barrier transport of amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975; 401(1): 128–36. Publisher Full Text
  15. Oldendorf WH, Szabo J. Amino acid assignment to one of three blood-brain barrier amino acid carriers. Am J Physiol 1976; 230(1): 94–8.
  16. Smith QR, Momma S, Aoyagi M, Rapoport SI. Kinetics of neutral amino acid transport across the blood-brain barrier. J Neurochem 1987; 49(5): 1651–8. Publisher Full Text
  17. Smith QR, Takasato Y. Kinetics of amino acid transport at the blood-brain barrier studied using an in situ brain perfusion technique. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1986; 481: 186–201. Publisher Full Text
  18. Moja EA, Restani P, Corsini E, Stacchezzini MC, Assereto R, Galli CL. Cycloheximide blocks the fall of plasma and tissue tryptophan levels after tryptophan-free amino acid mixtures. Life Sci 1991; 49(15): 1121–8. Publisher Full Text
  19. Wurtman RJ, Hefti F, Melamed E. Precursor control of neurotransmitter synthesis. Pharmacol Rev 1980; 32(4): 315–35.
  20. Marsh DM, Dougherty DM, Moeller FG, Swann AC, Spiga R. Laboratory-measured aggressive behavior of women: acute tryptophan depletion and augmentation. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002; 26(5): 660–71. Publisher Full Text
  21. Dougherty DM, Marsh-Richard DM, Mathias CW, Hood AJ, Addicott MA, Moeller FG, et al. Comparison of 50- and 100-g L-tryptophan depletion and loading formulations for altering 5-HT synthesis: pharmacokinetics, side effects, and mood states. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008; 198(3): 431–45. Publisher Full Text
  22. Fernstrom JD. Role of precursor availability in control of monoamine biosynthesis in brain. Physiol Rev 1983; 63(2): 484–546.
  23. Chanut E, Zini R, Trouvin JH, Riant P, Tillement JP, Jacquot C. Albumin binding and brain uptake of 6-fluoro-DL-tryptophan: competition with L-tryptophan. Biochem Pharmacol 1992; 44(10): 2082–5. Publisher Full Text
  24. Frazer A, Hensler JG. Serotonin. In: Siegel GJ, Agranoff BW, Albers RW, Molinoff PB, eds. Basic neurochemistry: molecular, cellular and medical aspects. New York: Raven Press; 1994, pp. 283–308.
  25. Marsden CA. The neuropharmacology of serotonin in the central nervous system. In: Feighner JP, Boyer WF, eds. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors. Chichester: Wiley; 1996, pp. 1–34.
  26. Dingerkus VL, Gaber TJ, Helmbold K, Bubenzer S, Eisert A, Sanchez CL, et al. Acute tryptophan depletion in accordance with body weight: influx of amino acids across the blood-brain barrier. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2012; 119(9): 1037–45. Publisher Full Text
  27. Zepf F. Principles of rapid tryptophan depletion and its use in research on neuropsychiatric disorders. In: D’Mello J, ed. Amino acids in human nutrition and health. Oxfordshire: Cabi; 2012, pp. 418–26.
  28. Concu A, Fadda F, Blanco S, Congia S, Lostia M. Mental changes induced by the oral administration of tryptophan-free amino acid mixtures in man. IRCS Med Sci 1977; 5: 520.
  29. Fadda F. Tryptophan-free diets: a physiological tool to study brain serotonin function. News Physiol Sci 2000; 15: 260–4.
  30. Moja EA, Stoff DM, Gessa GL, Castoldi D, Assereto R, Tofanetti O. Decrease in plasma tryptophan after tryptophan-free amino acid mixtures in man. Life Sci 1988; 42(16): 1551–6. Publisher Full Text
  31. Young SN, Smith SE, Pihl RO, Ervin FR. Tryptophan depletion causes a rapid lowering of mood in normal males. Psychopharmacology 1985; 87(2): 173–7. Publisher Full Text
  32. Booij L, Van der Does AJ, Haffmans PM, Spinhoven P, McNally RJ. Acute tryptophan depletion as a model of depressive relapse: behavioural specificity and ethical considerations. Br J Psychiatr 2005; 187: 148–54. Publisher Full Text
  33. Allen PP, Cleare AJ, Lee F, Fusar-Poli P, Tunstall N, Fu CH, et al. Effect of acute tryptophan depletion on pre-frontal engagement. Psychopharmacology 2006; 187(4): 486–97. Publisher Full Text
  34. Klaassen T, Riedel WJ, Deutz NE, Van Someren A, Van Praag HM. Specificity of the tryptophan depletion method. Psychopharmacology 1999; 141(3): 279–86. Publisher Full Text
  35. Moeller FG, Dougherty DM, Swann AC, Collins D, Davis CM, Cherek DR. Tryptophan depletion and aggressive responding in healthy males. Psychopharmacology 1996; 126(2): 97–103. Publisher Full Text
  36. Kewitz A. Biochemische Untersuchungen zur Optimierung des ‘Rapid Tryptophan Depletion-Test’ (RTD): Eine physiologische Methode zur akuten Verminderung der zentrainervösen Serotonin-Synthese in der psychobiologischen Forschung. Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität zu Frankfurt am Main; 2002.
  37. Demisch L, Kewitz A, Schmeck K, Sadigorsky S, Barta S, Dierks T, et al. Methodology of rapid tryptophan depletion (RTD): impact of gender and body weight. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002; 252(2): 1.
  38. Biskup CS, Sanchez CL, Arrant A, Van Swearingen AE, Kuhn C, Zepf FD. Effects of acute tryptophan depletion on brain serotonin function and concentrations of dopamine and norepinephrine in C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice. PLoS One 2012; 7(5): e35916. Publisher Full Text
  39. Demal U. SKIDPIT-light Screeningbogen. Universität Wien; 1999.
  40. Weiß R. Grundintelligenztest skala 2 – revision CFT 20-R [Culture fair intelligence test scale 2 – revision]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2006.
  41. Zepf FD, Poustka F. 5-HT functioning and aggression in children with ADHD and disruptive behaviour disorders. Hum Psychopharmacol 2008; 23(5): 438. Publisher Full Text
  42. Zepf FD, Wockel L, Poustka F, Holtmann M. Dietary tryptophan depletion according to body weight – a new treatment option in acute mania? Med Hypotheses 2009; 72(1): 47–8. Publisher Full Text
  43. Zepf FD, Stadler C, Demisch L, Schmitt M, Landgraf M, Poustka F. Serotonergic functioning and trait-impulsivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disordered boys (ADHD): influence of rapid tryptophan depletion. Hum Psychopharmacol 2008; 23(1): 43–51. Publisher Full Text
  44. Zepf F, Holtmann M, Stadler C, Demisch L, Schmitt M, Wöckel L, et al. Diminished serotonergic functioning in hostile children with ADHD: tryptophan depletion increases behavioural inhibition. Pharmacopsychiatry 2008; 41(2): 60–5. Publisher Full Text
  45. Pardridge WM. Brain metabolism: a perspective from the blood-brain barrier. Physiol Rev 1983; 63(4): 1481–535.
  46. Helmbold K, Bubenzer S, Dahmen B, Eisert A, Gaber TJ, Habel U, et al. Influence of acute tryptophan depletion on verbal declarative episodic memory in young adult females. Amino Acids 2013; 45(5): 1207–19. Publisher Full Text
  47. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54(6): 1063–70. Publisher Full Text
  48. aan het Rot M, Benkelfat C, Boivin DB, Young SN. Bright light exposure during acute tryptophan depletion prevents a lowering of mood in mildly seasonal women. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 18(1): 14–23. Publisher Full Text
  49. Stadler C, Zepf FD, Demisch L, Schmitt M, Landgraf M, Poustka F. Influence of rapid tryptophan depletion on laboratory-provoked aggression in children with ADHD. Neuropsychobiology 2007; 56(2–3): 104–10.
  50. Zepf FD, Wockel L, Poustka F, Holtmann M. Diminished 5-HT functioning in CBCL pediatric bipolar disorder-profiled ADHD patients versus normal ADHD: susceptibility to rapid tryptophan depletion influences reaction time performance. Hum Psychopharmacol 2008; 23(4): 291–9. Publisher Full Text
  51. Nishizawa S, Benkelfat C, Young SN, Leyton M, Mzengeza S, de Montigny C, et al. Differences between males and females in rates of serotonin synthesis in human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94(10): 5308–13. Publisher Full Text
  52. Badawy AA, Dougherty DM, Richard DM. Specificity of the acute tryptophan and tyrosine plus phenylalanine depletion and loading tests part II: normalisation of the tryptophan and the tyrosine plus phenylalanine to competing amino acid ratios in a new control formulation. Int J Tryptophan Res 2010; 3: 35–47. Publisher Full Text
  53. Riedel WJ, Klaassen T, Deutz NE, Van Someren A, Van Praag HM. Tryptophan depletion in normal volunteers produces selective impairment in memory consolidation. Psychopharmacology 1999; 141(4): 362–9. Publisher Full Text
  54. Schmitt JA, Jorissen BL, Sobczak S, Van Boxtel MP, Hogervorst E, Deutz NE, et al. Tryptophan depletion impairs memory consolidation but improves focussed attention in healthy young volunteers. J Psychopharmacol 2000; 14(1): 21–9. Publisher Full Text
  55. Sobczak S, Riedel WJ, Booij I, Aan Het Rot M, Deutz NE, Honig A. Cognition following acute tryptophan depletion: difference between first-degree relatives of bipolar disorder patients and matched healthy control volunteers. Psychol Med 2002; 32(3): 503–15. Publisher Full Text
  56. Evers EA, Sambeth A, Ramaekers JG, Riedel WJ, Van der Veen FM. The effects of acute tryptophan depletion on brain activation during cognition and emotional processing in healthy volunteers. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16(18): 1998–2011. Publisher Full Text
  57. Young SN. Acute tryptophan depletion in humans: a review of theoretical, practical and ethical aspects. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2013; 38(5): 294–305. Publisher Full Text
  58. Young SN, Leyton M. The role of serotonin in human mood and social interaction. Insight from altered tryptophan levels. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002; 71(4): 857–65. Publisher Full Text
  59. Booij L, Van der Does W, Benkelfat C, Bremner JD, Cowen PJ, Fava M, et al. Predictors of mood response to acute tryptophan depletion. A reanalysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002; 27(5): 852–61. Publisher Full Text
  60. Wieser H, Belitz HD. Relations between structure and bitter taste of amino acids and peptides. I. Amino acids and related compounds]. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 1975; 159(2): 65–72. Publisher Full Text
  61. Yudkoff M. Brain metabolism of branched-chain amino acids. Glia 1997; 21(1): 92–8. Publisher Full Text
  62. Hutson SM, Lieth E, LaNoue KF. Function of leucine in excitatory neurotransmitter metabolism in the central nervous system. J Nutr 2001; 131(3): 846s–50s.
  63. Khaliq S, Haider S, Naqvi F, Perveen T, Saleem S, Haleem DJ. Altered brain serotonergic neurotransmission following caffeine withdrawal produces behavioral deficits in rats. Pak J Pharm Sci 2012; 25(1): 21–5.
  64. Haleem DJ, Yasmeen A, Haleem M, Zafar A. 24h withdrawal following repeated administration of caffeine attenuates brain serotonin but not tryptophan in rat brain: implications for caffeine-induced depression. Life Sci 1995; 57(19): PL285–92. Publisher Full Text
  65. Van Donkelaar EL, Blokland A, Ferrington L, Kelly PA, Steinbusch HW, Prickaerts J. Mechanism of acute tryptophan depletion: is it only serotonin? Mol Psychiatry 2011; 16(7): 695–713. Publisher Full Text
  66. Crockett MJ, Clark L, Roiser JP, Robinson OJ, Cools R, Chase HW, et al. Converging evidence for central 5-HT effects in acute tryptophan depletion. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17(2): 121–3. Publisher Full Text
About The Authors

Maike Linden

Germany

Katrin Helmbold

Germany

Janina Kempf

Germany

Shabnam Sippas

Germany

Christian Filss

Germany

Karl-Josef Langen

Germany

Albrecht Eisert

Germany

Florian Daniel Zepf
http://www.uwa.edu.au/cap
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The University of Western Australia (UWA), Perth, Australia
Australia

Prof. Dr. Florian D. Zepf is the Chair and Winthrop Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the University of Western Australia, and the Clinical Director / Head of Department of the Specialised Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in Western Australia.

He is the recipient of prestigious research awards, including the "Young Minds in Psychiatry Award" (awarded by the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education), the Donald J. Cohen Fellowship Award (granted by the International Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions) and the Raine Visiting Professorship of the University of Western Australia.

He has published several papers and book chapters on a variety of topics related to different aspects of mental health in children and adolescents, and is an internationally highly recognized clinician and researcher in the field of paediatric neuropsychopharmacology. His main research interests are neurochemical aspects of brain function and their development in neuropsychiatric disorders, neuroimaging, neurofeedback, eating disorders as well as attention and affective disorders.

He is a member of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the German Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy (DGKJP), the Society of Biological Psychiatry (SOBP), the International College of Neuropsychopharmacology (CINP), the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP), the International Society fo Serotonin Research, and the International Society for Tryptophan Research (ISTRY).

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Related Content